Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

The global trend to unaccountable regulatory bodies is interrogated in wide ranging research from Oxford University.

Demystifying private sector standards bodies

Image credit: Shutterstock

The last two decades of the 20th century saw the rise of an unexpected phenomenon: private sector standards bodies as global rule-makers.  Governments in many countries, lacking resources and expertise, were content to allow regulatory power to be delegated to bodies such as the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). These and other bodies have gone on to exert a huge influence on global rules in finance and trade.

These seemingly unaccountable bodies, wielding power on an international scale, stand in contrast to global aspirations towards more democratic forms of governance. What is the global effect of technical rule-making by the private sector on both the evolved democratic nations and those where democracy is just taking root? These questions preoccupy Professor Walter Mattli, at the Department of Politics and International Relations.

Together with Tim Büthe, Associate Professor of Political Science at Duke University, he undertook the first systematic empirical investigation of the practice of private standards bodies. Mattli and Büthe aimed to end the inherent secrecy of private rule-making and make the processes of the standards bodies more open and transparent.

Taking the ISO and IEC – which collectively account for 85% of all international product standards – Mattli and Büthe conducted business surveys in five countries of top and mid-level managers in leading global businesses across several industries. They found that international standards bodies act autonomously, and often without representation of all the appropriate stakeholders within and across societies. China and India, for example, are frequently underrepresented. The methodology of the standards bodies creates a democratic deficit.

Mattli and Büthe set out their findings in an award-winning book, The New Global Rulers. They have gone on to further the debate in a number of arenas, from the academic and the mainstream media to the political.  In 2012 the European Parliament held a workshop on international standardization, citing especially Professor Mattli's work on policy implications in the EU. The World Trade Organization has also benefitted from Mattli's pioneering investigation, as have private companies, international trade lawyers (for whom debate about which norms are legally binding is ever-present) and emerging economies.

China now has representation on the IASB and other major emerging economies are also seeking to strengthen their voice in private sector rule-making bodies. The practices of international bodies – initially unheralded, and for so long a mystery – are now becoming accessible and understood.

Themes